cannamanage/docs/sprint-14/cannamanage-sprint14-plan-review.md

Plan Review: Sprint 14 — Marketing & Monetization

Date: 2026-06-18 Module: cannamanage (full-stack) Reviewer: Lumen (Plan Reviewer) Documents: analysis v1, plan v2, testplan v2 Verdict: ✅ APPROVED

---

Summary

Re-review after v1 findings were addressed. All 4 findings (1 blocker, 3 warnings) from the v1 review have been properly resolved in v2. The plan is complete, correct, and ready for implementation.

v1 Finding Resolution

#	v1 Finding	Resolution in v2	Status
1	❌ QuotaExceededException naming conflict	Renamed to StorageQuotaExceededException in Step 4.4 with explicit note about existing class	✅ Fixed
2	⚠️ No sync for storage_limit_bytes on tier change	Added Step 4.9 onTierChange() hook in SubscriptionService	✅ Fixed
3	⚠️ English i18n keys not specified	Step 1.3 now states both de.json and en.json must receive equivalent keys; T-32 tests both	✅ Fixed
4	⚠️ extractClubId(user) not defined	Step 4.5 now has full implementation with Javadoc referencing DocumentController pattern	✅ Fixed

Reviewed Documents

Document	Version	Assessment
Analysis	v1	✅
Plan	v2	✅
Testplan	v2	✅

Checklist

Assessment

#	Check	Result	Note
1	Problem statement complete	✅	Clear: no landing page, no quota enforcement, basic login UI
2	Affected components identified	✅	15 components listed (was 14, +1 for new StorageQuotaExceededException)
3	Current state accurate	✅	Confirmed: no (marketing)/page.tsx, nav is hardcoded, V35 is latest migration
4	Risk assessment realistic	✅	5 risks with appropriate mitigations
5	Solution options evaluated	✅	3 options with effort estimates, Option A justified

Implementation Plan

#	Check	Result	Note
6	All requirements covered	✅	All 4 areas: landing, login, pricing, storage quota
7	Correct patterns referenced	✅	NextIntlClientProvider, Spring @Service, @PreAuthorize, CustomUserDetails cast pattern
8	File paths correct	✅	All verified against codebase
9	Implementation order logical	✅	Frontend (phases 1-3) → backend (phase 4) → integration (phase 5)
10	No gaps in steps	✅	Migration → entity → service → controller → exception → security config → tier-sync — complete chain
11	Flyway migrations planned	✅	V36 correct next number, H2-only appropriate for this project
12	Error handling planned	✅	402 with RFC 9457 ProblemDetail, floor-at-zero for decrements
13	No scope creep	✅	Explicitly defers overage billing and email notifications

Testplan

#	Check	Result	Note
14	Coverage complete	✅	Every plan step has ≥1 test. 32 tests across 4 areas.
15	Test types appropriate	✅	E2E for UI (Playwright), Unit for service logic, Integration for controllers
16	Edge cases covered	✅	Floor-at-zero (T-19), exactly-at-limit (T-15c, T-16b), near-limit thresholds
17	Test class naming correct	✅	StorageQuotaServiceTest, StorageControllerTest, DocumentServiceTest
18	Test method naming correct	✅	testGetUsage_calculatesCorrectly(), testCheckQuota_overLimit_throwsQuotaExceeded()
19	Test data defined	✅	Explicit UUIDs, byte values, and preconditions documented
20	SSH/manual tests identified	N/A	Not a PAISY project

Traceability Matrix

Acceptance Criterion	Plan Step	Test Case(s)	Status
AC1: Landing page renders	Step 1.1	T-01	✅ Covered
AC2: Landing responsive + dark/light	Step 1.1	T-02, T-03	✅ Covered
AC3: Admin login split layout	Steps 2.1, 2.2	T-06, T-07, T-08	✅ Covered
AC4: Portal login member-themed	Step 2.3	T-09, T-10	✅ Covered
AC5: Pricing shows storage	Steps 3.1-3.3	T-11, T-12	✅ Covered
AC6: Pricing FAQ storage	Step 3.4	T-13	✅ Covered
AC7: GET /api/v1/storage/usage	Steps 4.3, 4.5	T-23, T-24, T-25	✅ Covered
AC8: Upload rejected 402	Steps 4.3, 4.6, 4.7	T-16, T-27, T-31	✅ Covered
AC9: Delete decrements counter	Step 4.6	T-18, T-28	✅ Covered
AC10: Backfill on migration	Step 4.1	T-29, T-30	✅ Covered

Verdict

✅ APPROVED — All 20 checklist items pass. All 4 v1 findings resolved. Plan is complete, correct, and ready for implementation. Recommend GO.